Herzog on Netflix

Werner Herzog is a legendary, innovative, original, and many would say, “Crazy!” German filmmaker. He is without a doubt one of the most prolific artists in the medium, having made more than fifty fiction and nonfiction features (often blurring the line between these distinctions), along with a couple dozen shorts. Just for fun, or just to make extra money for his independent productions, he has also appeared in some mass market, mainstream works. You might have seen him without realizing it as the big bad guy in Jack Reacher (2012), or as a random oddball in Parks and Recreation (2009-2015) and The Simpsons (1989-).


werner-herzog parks and reck

werner-herzog simpsons

Last year Netflix produced a new doc by Herzon about volcanos, Into the Inferno (2016), and I recently noticed that they now have several of his films available for streaming. They don’t have anything too out there, like Even Dwarfs Started Small (1970), but they do have his most theatrically successful production, Grizzly Man (2005), and one of my all time favorite films, Little Dieter Needs to Fly (1997). You really should check them out!

I first came across Herzog in graduate school, when one of my professors showed us Little Dieter. Granted, not all of his films live up to the same level of genius but in the end I admire the fact that he just keeps going, learning, and trying new things. He defines and lives by his own code.

Years ago a colleague of mine said that he went to a lecture Herzog gave at a college and someone asked if he regretted the fact that so many of his works were nearly impossible to find. Hertzon brushed off the questions by saying, in his creepy German accent,  “Film is fleeting.” At first I thought the answer was silly. Film is one of the most permanent art forms around, right? It preserves moments, or the light reflected off moments, for all time. But that isn’t true because nothing last forever. Not film. Not even the Internet (sorry to break that to you). The more I have watched of Herzog’s catalog the more I have realized that his worldview is about the impermanence of things; all things. Embrace the moment, and enjoy it, because the moment is all you have. I don’t think he sees this as a particularly bad or sad view of reality. I think he finds sadness in the way most of us tend to view the world; trying to holding onto what is already gone.

Have you heard of the MasterClass website? They have several interesting, or what look to be interesting, courses from high-profile people that I’d like to take. It looks like the standard price for each is $90, which isn’t bad but it could quickly odd up. The one that keeps coming up in my Facebook newsfeed is Werner Herzog Teaches Filmmaking.

Along with Aaron Sorkin Teaches Screenwriting, I think I’m going to have to check out Herzog’s class in the near future. Damn you Netflix and social media advertising for rekindling my passion for filmmaking!

Believe Me

I was going to do my next post about President Bush’s new book, Portraits of Courage, or the wonderful new PBS miniseries I watch this week, Africa’s Great Civilizations, hosted by Henry Louis Gates, Jr. And I wasn’t even thinking I’d write anything today but then I woke up to the latest craziness from our so-called President and I was like, “Wow! Just, Wow!” watching the reaction of Trump Supporters on Twitter to his reckless and disgusting behavior.

The madness began with a series of tweets from @realdonaldtrump accusing former President Obama of tapping his phone, Trump Towers, and who knows what else.


After making these very serious charges, with no evidence or source cited whatsoever, he then went after Arnold Schwarzenegger; because a petty feud over the future of The Apprentice TV show is apparently every bit as  important as allegations that Obama abused his power.


Some people, myself included, pointed out the fact that Trump’s baseless accusations are the very definition of McCarthyism, but unfair and unbalanced Sean Hannity was quick to accept the “truth” as the Dear Leader told it, asking the infamous Watergate question:


A wide host of similarly fanatical and uncritical Trump Supporters followed suit. @bradcrain seemed to be convinced that Obama has already been convicted and the “DEMS” just couldn’t handle it.


In this up is down version of reality, Trump’s people are the ones showing their true colors. Rude, willfully blind, and childish colors. Honestly, what kind of people read unsubstantiated allegations and say to themselves, “How can I best use a meme to spread this disinformation?” I don’t know but Riya sharma and @chrisk2000 are two more of them:



This is the same pool of people who label everyone who disagrees with Trump as a, “liberal” or “communist,” including conservatives like myself, and then laughs at us for being unable to think properly. Truly crazy.

Worst of all are individuals like @BigStick2013, who embellish fake news with their own lies.


I told Mr. Drain The Swamp that there was “NO news” in the article he linked to, and certainly nothing about anything found at Trump Tower or the White House. All the article did was recaps Trump’s tweets and concluded that, “It is not clear what information Trump based his Tweets on.” For daring to point out the truth to BigStick Swamp Drainer, he blocked me.

What is happening here is a very sick manipulation of our already polarized public, designed only to further divide us and do harm to America, and every patriot should condemn it! Instead, disingenuous fools like Buck Sexton (who’s apparently a radio talk show host) are trying to spin this in ever more creative ways.


  1. Trump did not claim that Obama used FISA (The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) against him. Trump claimed wiretapping of an unspecified nature, carried out by unspecified agents, and told to him by unknown sources.
  2. If the FISA Court was used to tap Trump or any of his people, that would have come from a Justice Department investigation, which would need to make their case to the FISA Judges and show evidence that Trump and/or his team had done something wrong.
  3. There is no universal agreement in the press that Trump conspired with the Kremlin but it has been clearly established by the intelligence community and outside security experts that Russian hackers did try to interfere in our election. Even many of Trump’s key people have admitted this.
  4. There was zero evidence offered from Trump in his very unclear charges.

In short, the items Buck is pretending to equate are not equal. Not even close. Sadly, this is the kind of intellectual sloppiness that passes for logic in far too many public debates and a Yuge reason why we have a President Trump in the first place. I can only hope that we will learn from this and do better in the future.

Let’s get on with the inevitable and appoint a Special Prosecutor to investigate the allegations against the President and the allegations made by the President. I am confident that his uniquely horrible character will be exposed in the end, Believe Me!



Former President George W. Bush has a new book coming out tomorrow, Portraits of Courage, which features paints and biographies of Wounded Warriors that Bush has got to know over the years. I ordered my copy this weekend and planned to blog about it once I got it. This morning, however, Bush was on the Today Show promoting the book along with four of the troops featured in it.

I see Twitter has been lighting up with comments about a few of Bush’s replies to Matt Lauer:

  • “I Consider Media Indispensable To Democracy”
  • “It’s important for the media to call to account people who abuse their power.”
  • “power can be addictive and corrosive”
  • “We all need answers” on extent of contact between President Trump’s team and Russia.

It’s funny to see how people are processing this information. For reasonable conservatives and liberal, or non-ideological people, these are welcome remarks, and fairly common sense positions, but for the polar extremes this is very upsetting. Many hardcore lefties who were once chanting about a, “Stolen election,” and how, “Bush lied,” they are amazed that President Trump is actually making Bush look good by comparison and the realization that Bush was never pure evil is one they are struggling to come to terms with. The alt-right, however, which always saw Bush as just another, “establishment,” “globalists,” “cockservative,” is enraged by his attack on their man in the White House. Bush faild to stand up to Obama’s efforts to, “destroy America,” they say; now he’s attaching Trump. WTF?!

As I’ve said before, I’m a part of the 23% who still approved of President Bush when he left office and I not only continue to approve of him, I admire him. I am confident that history will come to a much more reasonable assessment of his Administration and his life than the emotionally charged reactions of today. I am also hopeful that we can resist the magnet pull of the nutty extremes and move to a more reasonable political discourse if we are willing to work at it. 

Any husker du, I’ll share my thoughts on President Bush’s new book here, ASAP. 

RIP Bill Paxton

Michael Cain and Bill Paxton at the Dallas International Film Festival, 2010.

The night I met Bill Paxton was the Dallas premier of The Greatest Game Ever Played (2005), which he had directed. I was working for Michael Cain (not the actor) at the time, as an assistant editor on Michael’s documentary, TV Junkie (2006), and he wanted to reward me for the extra hours I was putting in by taking me to this special event.

If you haven’t seen it, The Greatest Game Ever Played is the story of a legendary matchup at the 1913 US Open. A 20 year old nobody, Francis Quimet (Shia LaBeouf), took on his idol, a former US Open Champion from England, Harry Vardon (Stephen Dillane), and won. What I remember most about the film is the way they shot the golf swings, like we were following the club around through the air before it made contact with the ball. It brought a high speed element to a normally sedate game and worked well, though it was arguably a bit overused.

After the screening there was a small party at the bar next door. I remember talking to a producer who introduced me to Shia. He was friendly enough, shaking my hand and pretend it was, “nice to meet you,” or something like that, but he quickly turned back to the producer and asked when he could, “get out of here?” You see, there were these girls – he motioned to a couple of young women nearby – and they, “had some weed,” and wanted to, “get back to his hotel room.” I couldn’t quite hear what the producer said but it wasn’t long before Shia and the girls were gone.

Paxton was having dinner with his father and some other people. He grew up in Fort Worth, which is why he wanted to have a Texas premiere. Michael told me we should get going, he didn’t want to both Paxton with his family, but he was just going to say, “goodbye.” I hung back and thought this was as close as I’d come to meeting the man, then I heard Paxton get all excited about how nice it was to see Michael again and he insisted we come back to the hotel.

It was a big suite, with a couple of bedrooms and a large balcony. Paxton saw his father to bed and told us to grab whatever we wanted from the minibar; “Disney’s paying for it.” We went outside to not disturb his dad and hung out for quite some time. The thing I remember most was Paxton turning suddenly to me, locking in on my eyes and asking, “So, what’s your story?” It’s a line I’ve used a lot on other people since then.

The other thing I can recall about our conversation was Paxton quizzing us about how much we liked the film. This was only the second feature he had directed and his first, Frailty (2001), was much darker and very different. He made it clear that he had high hopes this time around, doing a feel-good production that had the potential to be an award winner. Seabiscuit (2003), the story of a race horse during the Great Depression, who shattered expectations and inspired many people, was the analog he came up with to express his optimism. “We are Seabiscuit,” he said with a beaming smile. “Nobody expects us to win but we can break out of the pack and do this.” I liked the film but did not share his optimism. Obviously I wasn’t going to let on to him about this and I listened enthusiastically. It struck me as charming and very human that despite all his success over many years in Hollywood, he could still sound like a kid, brand new to the business and super hopeful that great things lay ahead. In the end, I don’t think it matters that the film wasn’t the Oscar Winner he was hoping for; what matters is that he continued to be hopeful.

It was sad to wake up to the news today that he had passed away, on the morning of this year’s Oscars. I trust they will be saying nice things about him tonight. When I put on my headphones and opened up Spotify I nearly unconsciously went to David Bowie’s Ziggy Stardust album and started playing it. I had listened to about a hundred times last year after Bowie’s passing and I guess it’s now become my soundtrack for a celebrity death; or at least for a celebrity that actually matters to me. It’s funny the way the minds works, don’t you think?

RIP Bill Paxton. My thoughts go out to his family and to our mutual friends, Michael Cain, Jeff Scheftel, and Tom Huckabee. I know they loved him like a brother.

Oscar Weekend

Oscar Statues on display at the Time War

The Oscars are this Sunday, February 26 at 7:30 CST. I’ve had the chance to see more of the films since the nominees were announced and, for what it’s worth, here are my thoughts on the categories where I have thoughts worth sharing:

Note: Starred items * mark the ones I have watched.



Fire at Sea
I Am Not Your Negro
Life, Animated *
OJ: Made in America *
13th *

Fire at Sea, about desperate migrants on the Italian island of Lampedusa, looks interesting and Life, Animated about a fun-loving Autistic young man, was very nice, but I think this award is going to go to one of the three docs dealing with race in America. I wish I had seen I Am Not Your Negro, which looks at American History through the words of writer James Baldwin. In some ways it seems similar to 13th, which looks at the continued oppression of African Americans since the end of slavery. I think 13th is well done and something everyone should see but, judging just from my impression of the trailer, I feel like I Am Not Your Negro looks more personal and heartfelt.

OJ: Made in America is a very interesting look at the life of OJ Simpson and the wider context of the times in which he rose and fell in the public’s eye. Personally, however, I don’t feel like a five part, “film,” that is more than seven and a half hours in total running time, constitutes a, “feature.” I think it’s a TV series that was played in a few theaters to meet the technical qualifications for the Oscars but it should not be in the running here. That said, I would also encourage people to watch it.


Arrival *
Hacksaw Ridge
Hidden Figures *
Hell or High Water
La La Land *
Lion *
Manchester by the Sea
Moonlight *

I’m betting on Hidden Figures and I think it deserves to win. It’s a feel good movie that highlights an overlooked part of our history and makes you think about racism and sexism. Personally, however, I also think that it looks a lot like other feel good movies I have seen. Not that this is a bad thing, I’m just saying that part of me would like to see a more outside the box winner and the one that felt the most original to me was Moonlight. This story, of a young gay black man with a drug-addicted mother, and the way in which it is told seem very fresh to me; though not very happy.

My fear (or “worry” might be a better word?) is that La La Land will have a wide appear to the Hollywood crowd and revive the hashtag #oscarsowhite. It’s a movie about the movie business and a throwback to classic musicals, which is bound to check a lot of boxes for many members of the Academy, but there are certainly far better films about the film business and far better musicals out there that never got fourteen nominations.


Casey Affleck, Manchester by the Sea
Andrew Garfield, Hacksaw Ridge
Ryan Gosling, La La Land *
Viggo Mortensen, Captain Fantastic
Denzel Washington, Fences

From what I have read and heard, I’m guessing this one will go to Denzel, with Casey Affleck as a possible alternative. I certainly don’t see why Ryan Gosling is on this list. Not that he did a bad job in La La Land – he was good – I just don’t see it as award worthy or particularly special in any way. I’d say take Gosling off and add in Joel Edgerton for Loving.


Isabelle Huppert, Elle
Ruth Negga, Loving *
Natalie Portman, Jackie *
Emma Stone, La La Land *
Meryl Streep, Florence Foster Jenkins

I have the same feeling about Emma Stone’s La La Land performance as Gosling’s; it’s fine but it’s not all that. Loving was an good, interesting and touching story about the end of miscegenation laws in America but Ruth Negga’s part almost felt like a supporting role to me. By far, I think Natalie Portman deserves to be recognized for her very believable impression of Jackie-O. Overall the film is a reasonable portrait of that tragic weekend in which President Kennedy was murdered and buried, and the way in which his widow helped to solidify his legacy, but Portman’s efforts to imitate Jackie’s distinctive manner without crossing the line into comedy was the best thing about it.


Arrival *
La La Land *
Lion *
Moonlight *
Silence *

I don’t have any strong feelings about the editing or cinematography for any of this year’s films but I would like to see Silence win something and this is the only category it is nominated in. This passion project from Martin Scorsese follows two 17th century Jesuit priests on a mission to Japan to spread the Gospel and find their old mentor, a priest who has apparently renounced his faith after Japanese authorities cracked down on Christianity and tried to stump it out completely from their empire. The film is a very interesting study in faith that raises questions about why people believe and how far they should go to spread, propagate, or defend their vision of what is true.



Kubo and the Two Strings *
Moana *
My Life as a Zucchini
The Red Turtle *
Zootopia *

Zootopia and Moana were good but standard fare, while The Red Turtle, with its lack of dialogue was nice but too Arthouse. My Life as a Zucchini looks good in terms of the visuals and the story – I hope to see it sometime – but Kubo and the Two Strings was so different from anything I have seen before and I really enjoyed it. It’s a must see and I hope it wins.


Deepwater Horizon
Doctor Strange
The Jungle Book *
Kubo and the Two Strings *
Rogue One: A Star Wars Story *

Just to reinforce that fact that Kubo and the Two Strings is unlike anything I have seen before, I’d like to see it take home this award as well. It’s one of those rare animated features that I wish would be considered for Best Picture, overall, and not just as a work of animation.